In Retro: "Dungeons & Dragons: Heroes" Review (Xbox)

My review of said game circa 2003...

* * *

“Baldur’s Gate: Dark Alliance,” despite bearing the “Baldur’s Gate” name, was more of a hack-and-slash game in the “Gauntlet” vein than anything as grand or complex as its Dungeons & Dragons heritage might have suggested. Even so, it made for a very fine game, and a quite successful one to boot. Well, all successful games have their imitators, and so “Dungeons & Dragons: Heroes” was born. If “Dark Alliance” was thin on roleplaying, then “Heroes” is downright skeletal. It bears even more of a resemblance to “Gauntlet” than its predecessor… but it’s actually a solid game, despite its flaws.

You get to pick from four different hero types at the beginning of the game (fighter, wizard, rogue, or cleric), you give that character a name, and you’re on your way into the realm of Bael, where an evil wizard is rising to overthrow all that is good and just in the world. A familiar setup, to be sure – yet it gets the job done, particularly since the storyline is clearly not much of an emphasis in the game. Even so, the game’s animated cutscenes are quite well rendered, and convey that tiny sliver of story in an entertaining fashion. The rest of the time, you roam the world in a way that’s highly reminiscent of “Gauntlet” or the aforementioned “Dark Alliance,” except now you have complete control over the game’s camera. You can rotate your view or zoom in or out to your heart’s content. Even so, it tends to be a bit of a hassle, particularly in the cooperative mode. It doesn’t help that playing from the furthest zoom makes you and your enemies so tiny you can barely see what’s happening, or that at the closest zoom the walls and other bits of scenery can completely obscure your vision in the midst of a brutal fight.

Camera niggles aside, the action is well-handled for a game of this type. There are a thousand monsters waiting to throw themselves at your sword, and hacking, slashing, and casting your way through them can be quite enjoyable. The enemies are many and varied, and in later levels become rather challenging (despite the game’s overall simplicity, I mean, but more on that in a second). Each area of the game comes complete with a nasty boss monster as well, and even though they’re exactly what you would expect from a D&D game (beholder, dragon, lich, etc.), they make for some exciting battles. Even so, I never once failed to destroy one of these end level baddies on my first attempt. In fact, I never died only to find myself having to restart from my last saved game, and that’s because the game is so generous with gold that you can literally build a surplus of health potions and continues (or special items that allow you to resurrect on the spot). So despite the swarming opponents you’ll face, you’ll never feel all that threatened. That can be good or bad, I suppose, depending on how you look at it, but because the game is so easy it also feels very short.

The whole thing gets off to a bad start. The first cavernous area you’re forced to explore is the very definition of bland. The next area, which comprises the forest just outside of Castle Bael, is a little better, but not by much, and the aforementioned fortress stronghold isn’t anything to write home about either. Even so, things do start to get a whole lot better as you progress. Even though it’s more than a little contrived, you’ll eventually wander through an ice-encrusted snowscape, a fiery ironworks, and a pyramid-spattered jungle. The variety is nice and makes you forget just how boring the first few episodes actually were.

In the end, I liked “Dungeons & Dragons: Heroes.” If you’re a fan of “Dark Alliance,” this is a good way to spend your time until “Dark Alliance II” comes out. “Gauntlet” fans should also take notice. Still, it has its share of problems, and does not match the quality of either game previously mentioned.

FINAL SCORE: 7.2 (Good)